|
|
History of Zion National Park
|
Zion National Park History
| |
Human History
Human use
of the Zion National Park landscape dates back to at least 6,000
B.C. Archeologists have divided this long span of human
history into four cultural periods, each characterized by
distinctive technological and social adaptations, that are briefly
summarized here.
•During the Archaic period (approximately 6000 B.C.- A.D. 500),
small groups hunted game and collected wild plants, seeds, and
nuts across the broad expanse of the Great Basin and western Colorado
Plateau. This mobile lifeway left few traces in the
archeological record, with the exception of materials recovered from
dry caves and a few deeply buried sites. In these
protected settings, perishable artifacts, such as baskets,
cordage nets, and yucca fiber sandals, survived. The
Archaic toolkits also included flaked stone knives, drills, and
stemmed dart points. The dart points were hafted to wooden
shafts and propelled by throwing devices, called atlatls.
•By about 300 B.C., some archaic groups had begun to supplement wild
foods in their diets by cultivating small patches of corn and squash
along rivers and near springs. Archeologists have labeled
these groups the “Basketmakers”, because of the abundance of coiled and
twined baskets found in many late Archaic sites. These early
experiments with horticulture reduced group mobility and increased the
need for food storage. Basketmaker sites often have grass or
stone-lined storage cists and shallow, partially underground dwellings,
called pithouses.
•Within a few centuries, small-scale gardening had intensified
into the full time horticulture that typifies the Formative
period (A.D.500-1300). Two distinctive horticultural
groups, the Virgin Anasazi and Parowan Fremont, appear in the
archeological record of Zion National Park during this period.
They established year round habitation sites (often called “pueblos,
the Spanish word for “village” or “community”) with pithouses,
storage cists, and later, above-ground masonry room blocks.
Grinding stones (“manos and metates”) signal the importance of
corn in the diets of both groups. Sedentary lifestyles
encouraged the production of plain and painted ceramic vessels.
These were used for storage, food preparation, and as trade goods
across broad geographic areas. The new technology of the bow and
arrow also gained widespread acceptance during the Formative
period. The extent to which the Virgin Anasazi exploited
wild plants and game is still unclear. Some researchers
suggest that they were almost totally dependent on cultivated
foods. By contrast, the Parowan Fremont may have
continued to hunt and collect a broad spectrum of wild resources to
supplement cultivated foods.
•Virgin Anasazi sites typically occur on river terraces along the
Virgin River and its major tributaries, overlooking the fertile
river bottoms where corn, squash, and other crops could be grown.
There is evidence that hunting and collecting parties made forays
to nearby upland areas, like the Kolob Plateau. Parowan
Fremont sites are found along stream courses and near springs.
They cultivated a drought and cold tolerant variety of corn
(called Fremont Dent) that could be successfully grown at higher
elevations. The Virgin Anasazi and Parowan Fremont appear
to have interacted along cultural contact zones, such as the
Kolob Plateau, during the last years of the Formative
period.
•Both the Virgin Anasazi and the Parowan Fremont disappear from
the archeological record of southwestern Utah by about A.D. 1300.
Extended droughts in the 11th and 12th centuries,
interspersed with catastrophic flooding, may have made horticulture
impossible in this arid region. Some researchers have
suggested that the sedentary horticultural groups could not
successfully compete for wild resources with the more mobile
Numic language speakers (such as the Southern Paiute and Ute) who
were in the region by at least A.D. 1100.
•The time span between A.D. 1300 and the late 1700s has
been described as the “Neo-Archaic” by some researchers, since
the lifeways were reminiscent of the earlier adaptation. The
Numic language speakers were the only occupants of the Zion
landscape. They depended on a wide array of wild plants and
animals, moving seasonally to hunt game or collect ripe seeds and
nuts. This mobile lifestyle was reflected in their material
possessions, which consisted of baskets, nets, and snares, as well as
bows and arrows. Some, particularly the Southern Paiute,
also planted fields of corn, sunflowers, and squash to supplement
their collected wild foods. These more sedentary groups made
brownware vessels that were for storage and cooking.
•The Historic period begins in the late 1700s, with the
exploration and settlement of southern Utah by Euro-Americans.
Initial explorations by traders from New Mexico blazed the Old Spanish
Trail, which followed the Virgin River for a portion of its
length. During the next century, American fur
trappers and government surveyors added new overland travel routes
across the region. In 1872, John Wesley Powell explored
the areas around Zion Canyon, as part of western surveys
conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey. The early pack
trails soon became well-used wagon roads, connecting Santa Fe to
the California markets.
•In 1847, Brigham Young led members of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) to Utah Territory, establishing
settlements in the Great Salt Lake Valley. Within a decade,
Mormon pioneers were sent to settle the southern part of the
territory and grow cotton in Utah’s “Dixie”. Towns like
Shunesberg, Springdale, Grafton, Adventure, and Paradise sprang up
along the upper Virgin River during the 1860s. In 1863,
Issac Behunin built the first log cabin in Zion Canyon, near the
location of the Zion Lodge. Soon the canyon was dotted
with other homesteads, including that of William Crawford, near
Oak Creek.
•During the remainder of the century, the small communities and
homesteads struggled to survive. Catastrophic flooding by
the river, little arable land, and poor soils made agriculture in
the upper Virgin River a risky venture. Some of these
settlements, including Shunesberg and Grafton, were ultimately
abandoned for more favorable locations.
•By the first decade of the 20th century, the scenic qualities of
southern Utah, and Zion Canyon in particular, had been recognized as a
potential destination for tourism. In 1909, a presidential
Executive Order designated Mukuntuweap (Zion) National Monument,
in Zion Canyon. The new monument was, however,
virtually inaccessible to visitors, since the existing roads were in
poor condition and the closest railhead a hundred miles
away. The Utah State Road Commission, established in that
year, began construction on a state highway system that would
eventually improve access to the southern region. State officials
also negotiated with the Union Pacific Railroad to develop rail
and automobile links and tourism facilities in southern
Utah. By the summer of 1917, touring cars could finally
reach Wylie Camp, a tent camping resort that comprised the first
visitor lodging in Zion Canyon.
•In 1919, a Congressional bill designating Zion National Park was
signed into law. Visitation to the new national park
increased steadily during the 1920s, particularly after the Union
Pacific extended a spur rail line to Cedar City. The Utah
Parks Company, a subsidiary of the Union Pacific, acquired the Wylie
Camp in Zion, and offered ten day rail/bus tours to Zion, Bryce,
Kaibab, and the North Rim of the Grand Canyon. Construction
on the Zion Lodge complex, designed in “Rustic Style” by
architect Gilbert Stanley Underwood, began in the
mid-1920s. In 1930, the newly completed Zion-Mt Carmel
highway allowed motorists to travel through Zion to Bryce and
points east. This highway was one of the greatest
engineering feats of modern times, requiring the construction of a
5,613-foot tunnel to negotiate the vertical sandstone cliffs of
Zion.
•Visitor numbers at Zion National Park have continued to increase
over time, necessitating the construction of trails, campgrounds, and
other facilities. The economic benefits of tourism now
support the small communities surrounding the park, ensuring
their survival into a new millennium of human history.
|
Information provided by: www.nps.gov
|
|
|